Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
GladioWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Operation Cyclone
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Scandals and Controversies== Operation Cyclone, while successful in its immediate objectives, is linked to several controversies: ===Support for Radical Figures like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar=== Hekmatyar’s Hezb-e-Islami received substantial CIA aid through Operation Cyclone, estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars. His group’s radical Islamist ideology and alleged involvement in opium trafficking (particularly in the late 1980s) embarrassed the U.S., as it highlighted the risks of arming extremists. Hekmatyar’s later opposition to U.S. forces post-2001, including surviving a CIA drone strike in 2002, underscored the blowback from supporting such figures. ===Drug Trafficking Allegations=== The CIA’s partnership with the ISI and mujahideen groups coincided with a boom in Afghanistan’s opium trade, which became a major global heroin source by the 1980s. While no definitive evidence shows the CIA directly facilitated drug trafficking, critics argue that the agency turned a blind eye to mujahideen involvement, including Hekmatyar’s, to prioritize anti-Soviet goals. ===Blowback and Al-Qaeda’s Formation=== Operation Cyclone’s funding of foreign jihadists, facilitated by Saudi Arabia and the ISI, created a network that evolved into [[al-Qaeda]]. [[Osama bin Laden]], though not a direct CIA asset, benefited indirectly from the training and resources provided to mujahideen groups. The CIA’s failure to anticipate the long-term consequences of arming Islamist fighters is a major critique, often cited as a precursor to modern terrorism.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to GladioWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
GladioWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)